Skip links

In 2020, native advertising will be more programmatic and mobile – but less social

A report, recently published by eMarketer, presents its predictions by juxtaposing 2018 numbers with 2020 estimates. It concludes that in 2020, native advertising will be more programmatic and mobile, but less social. That said, social native advertising still commands around 75% of native spending, however, that figure is expected to go down by 2020.

This bodes well for native advertising tech companies moving forward, especially content demand-side platforms (DSPs). The industry’s outlook is rosy indeed – as social’s share of voice declines programmatically, it’s the non-social technology platforms that will benefit the most.

However, the report goes on to warn that fragmentation in the market could be a problem for buyers, with so many vendors globally. It’s the DSPs that solve for this fragmentation, by consolidating the supply vendors under one platform, that have the greatest growth outlook moving into 2020.

In addition, the report cites MediaRadar’s H2 2018 numbers which show that new advertisers using native have stagnated. This, according to the report, indicated that the native market is mature. The MediaRadar report also found that in H1 2018, 473 advertisers placed native ads for the first time each month, on average. However, it also shows that only 11% of online advertisers are placing native ad units.

Is Programmatic Native Advertising Mature?

The eMarketer analysis notes that:

“Native advertising outside social platforms still faces many of the same challenges as it did in 2018, including advertiser clients not educated about native formats and native creative.”

Based on these two reports, it’s hard to confidently say that native advertising is mature when just over 1/10th of online advertisers are doing it. Lack of education, and technology fragmentation, certainly play both a role in this, however marketers in the field tell me that paid media budgets are also siloed away from content marketing by old, more traditional, corporate structures.

The average television executive spends five dollars on distribution for every one dollar they spend on creative. Based on my own research, the average content marketer does the opposite. This is also to blame for why only 11% of brands doing online paid media are also using programmatic native distribution.

But this doesn’t change the fact that programmatic native advertising, on social and other networks, is the most effective scaled paid distribution and amplification channel for top and middle funnel content.

According to the Content Marketing Institute, content marketing adoption rates for B2B brands is around 91%, and 86% for B2Cs. This means that there’s a whole lot of brands creating content and NOT doing any form of paid content amplification.

___
by Chad Pollitt
source: SocialMediaToday